Kaur H, Arora S, Sharma V, Kaur K, Kamboj S. Study of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpC beta-lactamases producing Klebsiella from clinical samples in tertiary care hospital of Punjab. World J Virol 2026; 15(1): 118602 [PMID: 41884455 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118602]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the editorial team of the World Journal of Virology for their professional and efficient manuscript handling process. The online submission system was user-friendly and streamlined, making the submission and revision process smooth.
The peer review process was timely, fair, and constructive. The reviewers’ comments were insightful and helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We particularly appreciate the anonymous and objective review system maintained by the journal.
We are also very satisfied with the high standard of editing, formatting, and presentation of the article, including the quality of the PDF, full-text version, figures, and tables. The journal’s strict adherence to academic rules, ethical standards, and misconduct detection further strengthens its credibility.
Overall, the publication process was efficient and well-organized, and we are grateful to the editorial office for their support throughout. We highly appreciate the commitment of the World Journal of Virology to maintaining high academic and publishing standards.
Best Regards.
Dr. Harpreet Kaur
Corresponding Author
(On the behalf of all authors)
Reply from the Editorial Office
Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. We would love to work with you again!